Tuesday, September 30, 2008

A link, a rant, an angry Koori girl

In which there is a difference between white privilege and "light skin" privilege.

I was linked to this post via the Light, Not White community on Livejournal, which produces some great discussion and resources but has the entries locked to members only.

The author of that post, Humph, not only sums up my antagonism on the subject perfectly, but does so whilst providing some great links.

This paragraph particularly had me nodding emphatically:

Also, before you decide whether or not you're entitled to police someone else's identity, I suggest you think about the ways in which some "light skinned" non-white people ended up with European-style colouring/features/hair texture. My family is multiracial because my family has chosen, for generations, to be multiracial, however, my family is also multiracial because white men raped enslaved African people and their descendants (i.e. 99.99% of African-Caribbean people are biracial or multiracial and NOT by choice). Many indigenous people in places which were colonised by white people also have ancestors who were raped by white people and, because of the vagaries of genetics, this sometimes shows in a child generations later (and, of course, those rapes are still happening NOW). Being "light skinned" might bring some privilege but it can also be a lifelong mark on non-white bodies of our ancestors' pain.


To put this into the context of my own racial heritage: Indigenous Australians were the victims of a deliberate attempt to breed us out. While the recent publicity and coverage of the Stolen Generation(s) has brought some awareness to this segment of Australian history, it's still glossed over and made palatable for mainstream consumption.

The attempts to breed out Indigenous Australians, the removal of pale skinned and mixed-race children, the deliberate "impregnation" of pale-skinned Indigenous women and girls by white men who were rarely looking to establish a supportive family unit based on mutual respect: government-sanctioned of rape and child abuse continuing on for generations and then erased from the common knowledge bank. This is a part of our history, and it is written on our skins.

As far as I'm concerned, if you are a white Australian and you attempt to deny or belittle the Aboriginality of any Indigenous Australian based on the paleness of their skin, you are a participant in continuing that particular slice of history. On top of the already audacious presumption that you would know someone else's race better than them, you are also giving two thumbs up to generations of rapists and racists and telling them they succeeded in their aims to "breed out" our people.

I tell people I meet that I'm Indigenous Australian, or Koori, or Aboriginal. I don't expect them to guess from my appearance, although the odds tend to go up if I'm with my relatives. I do expect them to accept my identification. I can't use the words I'll use amongst other Indigenous Aussies, though. While "Koori" might pass, if I call myself a blackfella in front of unknown white people I'm almost certain to get argued with, or laughed at, and be told that I can't use the word my people use to refer to ourselves. And then they wonder why I'm so fucking angry.

My skin is pale... I'm wajin looking. I'm no less Koori, no less Wiradjuri because of my tint. I'm a child of my ancestors, and their stories are written on my skin.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Linky: Family relations in the Nolanverse.

Family relations in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight.

Great post. You know, I was so busy being livid over the disregard paid to Barbara Gordon and the Jim Gordon/Barbara Gordon relationship that I didn't even NOTICE the poor treatment given to Martha Wayne/Bruce Wayne. I guess I'm just used to that particular relationship being downplayed, with Martha's lasting influence on Bruce usually reduced to a scream and a shot/frame of a broken string of pearls or a rose hitting the ground.

Aboriginal Rights Rally this Saturday

Link to flyer.

National day of Action.

R and I will be heading along, hopefully with some friends. R went to the last one and described it as mixed and very positive.

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Queensland Opposition enrages me

Sex worker service a 'disgusting waste of money'.

Hey, Mark McArdle? Fuck you. I think your promotion of anti-sex-worker views whilst drawing a paycheck as a public servant is disgusting, but I guess I should blame the idiots who voted you in.

You know what one of the effects of decriminalised sex work (and, one could argue, the driving motivation behind many governments instituting the model) is? Sex workers, as workers in a decriminalised industry, pay income tax. We also buy goods and services, in this country meaning that we pay the Goods and Services Tax on everything we purchase, collect the GST from our clients on behalf of the government, pay taxes on property we own, and contribute to "public funds" in a variety of other ways, many of which we probably don't even realise we're doing. We're taxpayers, fucko. And that means we have the exact same rights as any other taxpayer and any other worker to have public funds spent on our interests, on increasing our well-being and on improving our working conditions.

Safe-sex products and education for sex workers save lives, as well as being a major factor in taking strain off that health system you pretend to care so much about.

Oh, and don't think I didn't notice you're in Queensland, jerkface. You know why the government is re-allocating funds for sex worker support in the first place? Because SQWISI, the previously funded sex worker staffed sex worker support service in Queensland, doesn't exist anymore. It says it right there on the page: All direct SQWISI services have now ceased. The organisation was abruptly defunded, and sex workers in Queensland left without any organisation to support and represent them. Since then, two entirely volunteer run bodies, one based in the North and one in the South, have been trying to get public health funding as the sex worker volunteers work around the clock without any support to make sure SOMEONE is still providing SOMETHING for Queensland sex workers, whether it's information on how to get those precious safe sex supplies, information and education on their legal rights and status, and referrals to relevant services. But, hey, I guess to you that's all "disgusting" and shouldn't be provided in the first place, right?

Friday, September 19, 2008

On cultural appropriation... links

I really should have a post here about cultural appropriation written by myself, but a bunch of other people have made posts that really sum up the issue perfectly.

The big one: Racialicious. A great, indepth post. Read it.

Choptensils. I only found this blogger through the Racialicious comment thread, but I'm a fan already. Make sure you read the comment thread to this post in its entirety.

Hyphen. Again, the comment thread is where the great stuff is on this post. Check it out.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

La Zuppa snacky

Oooer.

Due to a combination of being busy and broke this morning, and knowing that I was most likely going to be at my desk through lunch, I grabbed a cheap and crappy microwave soup thingy to have for lunch. It turned out to be quite delicious, to the point where it tasted like actual lentil soup, not crappy microwave canned soup substitute.

Turns out the LaZuppa soup range is the latest product from La Gina, better known as The Dudes Who Make The Tinned Tomatos. I had the lentil one, and a squint at the box reveals that the ingredients consist of onion, carrots, lentils, potato, celery, salt and cumin powder. Like actual soup. Not only that, they're gluten free and market themselves as both that and vegetarian on the front of the box. And they're a couple of dollars.

I'm totally a fan.

Work, Love and Play in Diverse Family Life: Study into LGBTQ parenting

From the email I received:

Australia's first major study into lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans parenting is now under way!

Titled “Work, Love and Play in Diverse Family Life”, it looks at how lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans parents are handling their parenting and household responsibilities, as well as relations with extended family and the broader community.

While the research is being funded by La Trobe University in Melbourne, it seeks to involve families from all over Australia and New Zealand. Researchers are keen for any lesbian, gay, bisexual or trans (LGBT) people who are actively parenting a child or children under the age of 18 to complete the questionnaire.

The questionnaire can be found online at: www.thisurvey.com/bouverie.

This is a great opportunity to find out about the positive aspects of everyday family life in our LGBT communities, and whether our families are getting the support they need.

More sex work media

Time for a threesome on prostitution.

This article has the usual shitty editing, and as always the SMH remains unable to tell the difference between decriminalisation and legalisation. Still, more sex worker voices in the media is a good thing, and I think it's a great piece. Elena Jeffreys has been outdoing herself in terms of media presence as Scarlet Alliance's president!

Jessica Loiterton is inspirational

Usually, my mainstream news links go to the Sydney Morning Herald. I'm flatly refusing to link to their story on Jessica Loiterton, though, because it's one of the most disgustingly rape-apologetic victim blaming pieces of shit I've read in a while. As Lillim so astutely points out, you should really pick up that you're doing News wrong when the Daily Terrorgraph reports on an issue more tactfully than your paper.

Here's their piece, written by Jessica herself. It must have been so hard for her to speak out about what happened to her, but she let herself be named and refused to be shamed by the usual "she was drunk!" bullshit. I've had problems with no less than three cab drivers, one of whom more or less abducted me and drove off into the backstreets of an unfamiliar suburb, and one who physically assaulted me. I know so many women who have experienced similar. That's been enough for me to feel unsafe and uncomfortable in cabs alone, and that's barely a fraction of what this strong, inspiring woman went through.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Link of rage, link of awesome, link of "Go decrim!"

Link of rage: Sex attack seen as 'childhood experiment' at Queensland school.

Seriously, WTF?? This boy threatened a girl with violence and forced her to perform a sex act on her, but hey! Boys will be boys!

Link of awesome: Unwanted Rescues: A poster from Thailand.

A poster from the Empower centre in Thailand. Sex workers there are speaking out against "rescue" missions that... well, the list of negatives are on the poster.

Link of "Go Decrim!": Sydney sex workers 'enjoy best health'.

Sex workers and sex worker rights advocates are extremely worried about the possibility that the new Liberal state government will squash the recent (fantastic!) legislative changes in WA. Researchers have apparently "found out" what we've been saying for years: that a system of decriminalised sex work helps the workers maintain a high standard of health, as opposed to the legalised and regulated systems that drive workers underground.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

This made me giggle



Click the image if it's too small for you to read.

Fantastic.

Brain being shit. Not good.

Here we go over the rollercoaster again.

Friday, September 12, 2008

The coolest thing I've seen in a while

POST-IT NOTE SLINKIES!

I so want to do this in the Whoreganisation office.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Debs on the Porn Debate

Across the Porn Divide, at Don't Stray From the Path.

Great post by Debs on That Issue and why it seems to consume all the energy in the feminist blogosphere like some XXX rated black hole. It's NOT the only issue relevant to contemporary feminism or feminists, and I'm sick of it being treated as the ultimate divider of feminists. I'm also sick of being labelled "pro-porn" because I don't fit into someone else's little box (when, actually, porn really isn't a key issue to me at all) but that's a more specific sore spot.

Three to four hours a day

Y'know, as far as I'm concerned, if you DON'T have a giant blogcrush on Kate Harding, you're doin it rong.

I found it hard enough to adjust to sleeping eight hours a night instead of my pre-diagnosis "few hours every three days or so" model, hereby referred to as the "Impending Crazy" model. Adding three to four hours of exercise to that? Well, it's a good thing us fatties aren't supposed to eat food, because something has got to give in that schedule

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Making a difference: Suicide in the Indigenous and GLBTQ communities

One man seeks to address the problem of suicide in both the GLBT and indigenous communities by taking to his feet.

As mentioned in the article, the Indigenous suicide rate is around four times the national average. For the non-Aussies reading (particularly the Brits, I've seen the piddly little distances you lot refer to as "a long way") Google Maps puts the journey from Cape York to Sydney at 3,448 km.

Permit system reinstated (sort of)

Permit system back under changes to NT intervention law.

Police and health care workers are one thing, but the exception for journalists strikes me as really not a good thing.

Suicide Prevention Day: Think Globally. Plan Nationally. Act Locally

Today is World Suicide Prevention Day.

It's a topic that's important to me, as I'm one of the many people in this world who are still here by a combination of accident and outside interference. For people with my particular diagnosis and onset age, the suicide rate is astronomical. I've lost friends to suicide, and I've lost friends over my own suicide attempts.

It's also one of those topics that cannot be divorced from gender. More men and boys successfully commit suicide than women and girls, but women and girls are more likely to have unsuccessful attempts and to be hospitalised.

I'm an incredibly busy hexy today, but will try to post more on this later. For now, some links on suicide and suicide prevention in Australia.

Suicide Prevention Australia.
Youth Suicide and Self-Injury Australia.
Lifeline's Role in Suicide Prevention. (Lifeline have helped me out a truly dangerous patch a few times)
Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice: Social factors in suicide in Australia.

Sympathy and strength to those who have been there, or who have lost a loved one to suicide.

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

New Scars for Old... more on Heart's trainwreck

Oddly enough, the thread at Heart's that I asploded over has now veered into the topic of self-injury and the damage done there. I recently posted about my self-injury scars, so the topic is fresh.

I'd essentially stormed off in disgust. I'd like to phrase it in a fashion that made me sound a little less prone to hissy fits, but I'm being honest. I was sickened and enraged when I last posted about that thread that I wasn't going to post on it any more. But then, as tends to happen, Ren quoted a particularly nasty chunk o' comment, and I found myself clicking through to the Thread Of Doom again.

I found these comments, by Laurelin:


121laurelin

I think there’s a biological/chemical component too. We know that bulimic women, for example, and women who cut, experience a sense of relief when they do these things that is caused by the release of endorphins.

I was a self-harmer, and although I wouldn’t say (even then I wouldn’t have said) that I ‘enjoyed’ it, it did, as you say, give me a release from intense emotion, no matter how brief. But it was still harmful. My arms, my thighs were still cut up and bleeding. I still felt the pain.

It was harmful.


122laurelin

‘Enjoying’ self-harm has to be seen in the context in which it takes place- in the midst of severe emotional pain or trauma.


While Heart's comments on women deluding themselves into "thinking" they enjoyed certain practices simply pissed me off (as I've said previously on that thread, hearing feminists express the idea that my nervous system and libido is a Trick of the Patriachy is pretty gutwrenching) Laurelin's comments were obviously sincere, and coming from a place I recognised. I didn't necessarily agree with the point she seemed to be making regarding the term "enjoy", however, so I posted this:

129hexy

Laurelin:

I had quite a lengthy period of self-injury, when I first got sick. I wouldn’t say I “enjoyed” it, but I would say it kept me alive.

One of those situations where the person in my head, me, gets to decide whether it was the best choice under the circumstances.


This is a topic I've discussed and debated quite a bit in the years since I started talking and writing about my illness, my brain and my recovery process, and I know so well that every self-harmer has a different perspective on their experiences with self-harm. As I mentioned in the scars post, I had a long and painful road to travel before I could accept that part of my recovery. Now? I own it, as the right decision and the best I could have made.

The decision that kept me alive was the right one.

Laurelin seems to get it:


#
131laurelin

Hexy- I was not trying to say that self-harm is the ‘wrong’ choice, or that one should be prevented from chosing it. I am just saying that the context must be taken into consideration. I don’t agree that self-harm was a ‘free choice’ for me- it was one of a number of what I consider to be lousy choices available at the time.

132laurelin

and also the self-harm I undertook perhaps had some beneficial aspects… as far as my own experience goes, I can’t say for sure. But I do ultimately think that I harmed myself too, in the sense that my body was damaged (however superficially) by it.

Hope that makes sense. This is very hard to verbalise.


I mean, we still appear to fundamentally disagree on certain facets of the self-injury issue, but that's OK.

Heart, on the other hand.... well. Here's her reply to my comment.

133admin

Laurelin: Hexy- I was not trying to say that self-harm is the ‘wrong’ choice, or that one should be prevented from chosing it. I am just saying that the context must be taken into consideration.

The discussion at issue was about what self-harm in the context of male heterosupremacy means for women.

Responding to that by saying, as you basically have, Hexy, “Well, I wanted to,” is not a response at all. It is not in good faith. It’s an attempt at a reversal, a trying to make Laurelin the Big Meanie, as though she was saying fuck-all about you or what you might have chosen, ever. She was talking about HER OWN LIVED REALITY and her thoughts about it, she wasn’t saying ANYTHING about what you may or may not have done sometime, let alone about what you “get” to decide.

There’s been this ongoing ignoring on the part of the pro-sex trade side of basically everything that has been posted here *by survivors*. That’s why there are a whole bunch of spammed comments to this thread that are not going to see the light of day. There will be actual, respectful *engagement* — not this glossing over and just saying, over and over again, well, I like to work out, I like to shave, I chose to self harm, you’re a meanie for bringing it up, as though any of that is even remotely relevant — or comments will not, again, be approved. Ignoring survivors who are putting themselves out there, risking becoming ill because they ARE putting themselves out there, to just assert and reassert, essentially, that their lives don’t matter to you at all, all that matters to you is what you, yourself, might have wanted to do some time, amounts to erasure. It is destructively and triggeringly dismissive. It’s what men do to us 24/7.



Hey, look! I'm wearing my enraged and disgusted face again! This thead seems to do that to me a lot, doesn't it?

Here's my reply to both Laurelin and Heart, still stuck in mod and probably destined to stay there:



136hexy
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Laurelin:

Hexy- I was not trying to say that self-harm is the ‘wrong’ choice, or that one should be prevented from chosing it. I am just saying that the context must be taken into consideration. I don’t agree that self-harm was a ‘free choice’ for me- it was one of a number of what I consider to be lousy choices available at the time.

That I do agree with. Context is vitally important. I think you and I may just differ on how we see the best of a crappy selection of choices: to me, the ability to make that choice is still an act of power, however slight. I could choose to harm, or I could give in and die. The alternative made it a strong choice for me.

and also the self-harm I undertook perhaps had some beneficial aspects… as far as my own experience goes, I can’t say for sure. But I do ultimately think that I harmed myself too, in the sense that my body was damaged (however superficially) by it.

Hope that makes sense. This is very hard to verbalise.


I understand the difficulty. When I first began to try and vocalise my experiences of self-injury and what the experience meant to me, it was near impossible to put those feelings into words.

I wrote about my relationship with my SI scars recently. It sounds like you and I see the damage done to skin very differently. Those scars to me are now proof of a battle won, not proof of damage. We all prioritise these things differently, though, and I in no way mean to imply that your understanding of your scars and your experience is wrong or bad… I am simply pointing out that, like everything else we’re been discussing, the internal experience varies wildly from woman to woman even when the external experience looks similar.

Thank you for addressing me courteously, btw, it’s something you’ve never failed to do.

Heart:

Responding to that by saying, as you basically have, Hexy, “Well, I wanted to,” is not a response at all.

“Well, I wanted to”? ?

That’s how you read what I wrote? Laurelin seemed to recognise my experience. Your ability to recognise suffering and trauma in women seems firmly wedded to how closely their ideology resembles yours.

I didn’t self injure because I “wanted to”, Heart. I self-injured because if I didn’t find some way to ground the riot of pain in my head, to vent it and connect it to my body, I was going to kill myself. That you can read the words “[self-injury] kept me alive” and translate it to “well, I wanted to” really explains so much of the apparent understanding going on here. Talk about denial of lived reality!

Oh, and as for “what you may or may not have done sometime”? Such dismissive language, even as you accuse women of using the same. I wish I could show you my skin right now… years of using self-injury as a coping mechanism certainly, as Laurelin pointed out, leaves its mark on your skin.


And my next reply to Heart:


137hexy
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

As for the words you’ve quoted from various prostituted women? I haven’t commented on them apart from saying that they’re important and should be heard because, well, I think they’re important and should be heard. What else would I say?

Women expressing their experiences = not something I’m going to argue with. Women denying mine, however? Well, see above posts.



Apparently, in addition to not caring how stressful and harmful it might be to those of us not on "Heart's side" (I reject the label "pro-sex-trade" quite vehemently) to have no respectful engagement regarding our experiences, to have our experiences ignored when we put ourselves out there and risk our mental health to be beaten down and erased by women who only care about the lives, stories and pain of women who fit the right narrative, it's now entirely acceptable to dismiss, minimise and erase the experiences of women who have battled serious mental illness and experienced self-harm and self-injury. I'm stuck wondering if there is any female experience Heart won't co-opt as her own.

To put it in context, when I first joined the feminist blogosphere, I did so quite openly as a non-neurotypical woman, a disability rights campaigner, and someone with a lengthy and painful struggle behind her dealing with the onset of serious mental illness in the wake of domestic violence and rape. This was the identity attached to "hexyhex" in the blogosphere, the experience of me that Heart and other feminist bloggers, had for years... right up until I outed myself as, incidentally, also being a sex worker. This is what is erased when an external decision is made that that final chunk of my identity not only outranks those previously known facets, but apparently (according to Heart's assessment, at any rate) negates them. This is what happens when a group of women decide to stick a bunch of labels on me that don't fit and aren't mine, and then use them to mark my experiences irrelevant, my perspectives wrong, and most painfully, my authority on my own life null and void.

I'm still proud of my scars and my choices. To someone else, their skin may be proof of harm. For me, it's proof of strength. It may not look like the "best choice" from the outside, but each one of those lines is part of the reason I'm still here. Once again, I find myself wondering why I can look at another woman's experiences and perspectives that are so different from mine and say "Hey, we went through some similar but wildly different shit, and both our stories are vitally important" when that basic communication skill seems lacking in others.

ARG.

Friday, September 05, 2008

Weapon Yum: A New Sausage

Remember the Fuck the Supermarket project? Operation Foodbox? The thing with the friends and the market and the box of fresh, affordable veges every fortnight? Well, that's still going. It's been a bit of a hit and miss, some of the boxes have been more useful than others, but as a general rule it's working out well and I'm pleased that I'm giving less money to the large supermarket chains. I'm still disgusted and enraged that it's this friggin' hard to obtain a box of truly inexpensive, fresh produce in Sydney, as it's hard to recommend to people that they set up a network of fortnightly bulk buys with friends who have the time, cars and other capacity to get to the market every two weeks. Still, if you can, do it. If nothing else, it really opens your eyes to just how big the mark up at the supermarket is.

ANYWAY. Long rambling intro aside, I had a vegetarian cooking experiment the other night and decided to blog about it. I was in the supermarket on my way to the Whoreganisation the other day, and I spotted a type of vegetarian sausage I hadn't tried before: Bean Supreme, a New Zealand brand. I'm quite fond of vegetarian sausages, especially the ones made with actual vegetables, but rarely buy them because they're just too pricey. I noted that these ones were predominantly tofu, which is unusual, and hence decided to give them a try. I rationalised the purchase with mental images of comfort food, and the thought that as it was the last day of winter I would have few opportunities for comfort food in the coming months.

Well, it's a good thing. These sausages? Not so great. I wouldn't say they were bad, as they didn't have an offputting taste and were edible... they just weren't anything special, and certainly not special enough to warrant the price tag. Bland, even for a tofu product. Even as a long time tofu lover, I'll tell you that THAT is saying something!

The meal consisted of potatoes, chopped and pan-fried, then covered with homemade vegetable stock and left to simmer. When the liquid was absorbed, I threw in a splash of balsamic vinegar and let the potatoes bubble and caramelise. The home-made stock is one of the best things about Operation Foodbox: it usually yields a batch every few months, which is then divided into a huge quantity of plastic take-away containers, stuck in the freezer, and used to cook pretty much everything until I run out.

The sausages were cooked with a mass of onions, then had some vegan BBQ sauce thrown on them. They were served with steamed snow peas, and a steamed artichoke each. Frankly, the artichoke was a bit of nuisance, but the downside of Operation Foodbox is trying to make use of the bizarre things that the people on market duty that week decide should be part of it. It's a pretty minor downside, and watching R (or "Captain Working-class" as his meal choices often suggest) trying to make sense of the first artichoke he'd ever eaten was quite worth it.

The sausages were just... meh. Taking into account the reduced cost of all the vegetables, they were stupidly overpriced and not worth it at all, and without the slatherings of sauce they would have been even more boring. I found myself wishing I'd spent the dosh on good old faithful Santiarium vege sausages, or better yet some plain tofu that could have filled that niche happily. They looked nothing, and I mean nothing like the picture on the packet. It's fairly standard for vegetarian meat alternatives to lie a little when it comes to illustrations, but when this picture houses a block of mush that has to be cut into separate sausages... well, that's a bit too far.

I won't be buying these again.

Some GLBTQ linkies

Pratt makes senate history from the SSO, and The Australian.

A rant from the SSO about the deplorable news situation regarding Matthew Mitcham's friggin unprecented achievement at the Olympics. As if it wasn't enough that he was the only openly gay male athlete at the entire Games, he managed something that amazing and still got straight-washed by the media. I'm disgusted, and I'm not even a sports fan.

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Coz nothing says "I'm really flat out busy trying to make deadlines" like playing around with your blog template

Or: That's not my cat.

Pretty?

Language, re-appropriation and Not Being An Asshole

Or: Lazy C+P posting continues

Since I'm still wearing my oh-so-comfy Ranty Pants and have recently noted how well they go with my Copy-Paste hat, have some posts on language and reclamation I made recently on some other blogs.

Language, insults and slurs have been a common topic around the blogosphere recently, or at least around the teeny tiny slice of it that I actually get around to reading. Ginmar made an incredibly powerful and confronting post on the topic. Renegade Evolution's post on Feministe about a particular piece of sex work/prostitution terminology sparked debate, discussion, arguments... and, as only Ren's posts seem able to do, a blogwar completely out of proportion to the original post. Finally, a post by Lillim popped up on my livejournal friends list, contemplating language use and asking people for their views on re-appropriation and reclamation.

She asked:

What words would you like to cut out of your vocabulary?
Do you think reappropriation works? Or should we just stop using particular words?


I came in pretty late to the thread, but my response can be found down the bottom:

I think re-appropriation is possible, it just takes a hell of a lot longer than most of us imagine. A good example is "queer"... I'd say that's been rather successfully reclaimed, but a huge part of that process was simply time. The word stopped being in regular usage as "negative word for homosexual" and was ripe for the reclaiming.

Most of the words that I use in a reclaim-y type way are still dependent on the ears of whomever is listening. "Whore" is rapidly become a word of pride for me, but only when used in certain company... ie, usually other mouthy whores. :) "Slut" and to a lesser extent "dyke" are similar. "Cunt" I try to only use to refer to vaginas, because I like that usage, but I do occasionally catch myself spitting it out as an insult. I don't like that usage. Perhaps in later, post-feminist years it will have the same connotations (or lack thereof) as dick or cock, but right now I just can't help but see the extra ferocity as a mark of misogyny.

I'm trying hard to stop saying "retarded". Some might argue that's "overly PC" of me... I just don't like to think that my words are unintentionally hurtful to people I'm not addressing through careless or ignorance, and I think that's a far more reasonable thing to try and avoid than my right to be offensive. In fact, if there's one phrase listed on this comment page that I would love to see obliterated from the common lexicon, it's "politically correct/PC". It's too easy for entitled assholes to insist they're rebelling against something imposed by oversensitive academics by claiming they're being "not PC!" in their language, and it misses the point. I'm not trying to be "politically correct". I just call it "not being an asshole". Using language that hurts the people around you because you're lazy, or think racist/sexist/etc slurs are funny, or are convinced you're making some kind of reactionary statement that coincidentally lines up with your privilege? Sorry, we already have a word for that. It's "asshole".

[/rant]


Seriously. Ditch this "PC" crap. Join those of us who just try not to be assholes. It's kinda freeing.

A few sex work links

A chance to fix the fight against Aids: To improve prevention, HIV/Aids organisations must roll back George Bush's demonising of sex workers and drug users.

The damage done to sex worker's rights and health globally during George Bush's presidency, and the backwards steps taken in the fight against AIDS in that same period, have been catastrophic.

Australia an attractive destination for Chinese sex workers: Survey

Interview with Scarlet Alliance president Elena Jeffreys (not Jeffries!) regarding a recent study done on Chinese migrant sex workers coming to Australia. Elena Jeffreys has been doing a lot of media regarding migrant sex workers and visas recently, especially since her opinion piece was published in the Sydney Morning Herald recently: Truth and Visas will set Asian Sex Workers Free.

Elena Jeffreys is also interviewed here discussing the Wei Tang sex slavery case currently being hashed out in court. I wish I could give more links about that particular case, but the vast majority of news articles that have landed in my inbox are full of blatant errors. Apparently fact checking is something done on articles about things more important than a dramatically significant precedent setting case in law relating to sex worker's rights.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

Heart's thread: So that's where the line is

Or: I finally fucking cracked

I'm a fairly polite person, on the internet. Oh, don't get me wrong, I swear like a fucking sailor, but I've always been of the opinion that if you're going to bother having a discussion or debate with someone, it's worth doing so with a modicum of courtesy. Sometimes I find it difficult to drop this standard.

That thread, at Heart's? The one with the... er... moderation issues? Right now I'm so fucking angry my hands are literally shaking, and I am done with polite.

First up, the trivial. Heart has apparently decided this comment is too dangerous to let out of mod, so I'm forced to address Maggie Hays here. Maggie, you seemed to feel a little harassed by my stating that I wasn't trying to speak for Ren when you'd already clarified yourself twice. Comment 76 on that thread is this:

76hexy
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Maggie, in regards to this:

Hexy, as I’ve already said *twice* (look) above:

My comment has been stuck in mod for a while, and from what i can see still is (which confuses me, as you’ve replied to it).

When I made that comment, those comments from you weren’t visible.


I can't for the life of me think why your friend and ally would prevent a comment going through that states that you weren't actually being hounded, but hey. Since you managed to reply to a comment of mine that is apparently STILL in moderation, I'm willing to acknowledge that I have no freakin' idea what's going on behind the scenes of that "discussion". But there you go. Didn't mean to hound you, couldn't see those comments when I posted, apologies for the misunderstanding.

On to the less trivial bits.

Heart posted, as part of one comment, the following:

As one formerly prostituted woman wrote to me (about this thread) via e-mail, calling prostituted women “sex workers” and using terms like “harm reduction” and “non-forced prostitution” is deeply insulting to her because it makes johns invisible, it makes the reality of a lifetime of having been groomed for prostitution invisible, and it places the responsibility to “reduce harm” or work for “harm reduction” on the prostituted women, as though it is up to them to make sure they are not raped or beaten.


(emphasis mine)

I posted this in response:

I’ve never seen the term “harm reduction” used to imply that the onus to reduce harm is on the prostituted woman or sex worker, and I’ve been involved in several harm reduction movements covering everything from sex work to drug use/abuse. The sex industry harm reduction model covers things like decriminalisation and legal protection, free provision of barrier contraception and access to medical treatment and support services as determined by the needs and wants of the people in the industry.

While I certainly empathise with your contact-via-email’s concerns about being labelled with language that isn’t hers (see, oh, everything I’ve posted) her objection to harm reduction as phrased here is based on a miscomprehension.


This comment was let through moderation immediately, as Heart responded to it. Her comment is reproduced here in full:

Hexy, I don’t think my contact suffers form a “miscomprehension.” I think she is talking about her lived reality in which there is all of this lofty speech from sex workers about all kinds of harm reduction– everything, of course, but the kind of “harm reduction” that would have actually benefitted her and 90 percent of the women and girls in the world who are prostituted, i.e., NOT HAVING TO BE PROSTITUTED AT ALL, not having to be raped, not having to be battered, not having to disocciate, not having to self-medicate, not living in fear, not being treated like so much trash. When the focus is on the rights of those who identify as sex workers and when theirs is the public agenda, the 90 percent of those who are prostituted and do not identify as “sex workers”, who want out, become invisible– to everybody. Because patriarchy wants very badly to focus ON the sex workers, and on all of this great harm reduction, and on the fact that sex work can be made “safe” or “safer”, *that way the 90 percent of women and girls who are involuntarily prostituted and can never be made safe can be ignored*. Prostituted women do not think of themselves as “people in an ‘industry’” working for their “wants and needs.” They are prostituted, used and abused like kleenex, and they want OUT before someone kills them or they kill themselves. God, hexy, you SO talk out of both sides of your mouth. On the one hand you make this huge distinction between SEX WORKERS and PROSTITUTES and insist the two categories not be confused. On the other hand you talk about harm reduction, decriminalization, etc., as though ALL prostituted women are in fact “sex workers,” referring to them as people in the “industry” who are organizing around “needs and wants”. It’s exhibit A of what my contact is talking about. She didn’t care about harm reduction, she didn’t want to be called a sex worker, she wasn’t organizing around needs and wants, she just wanted to get OUT, as by far most prostituted women DO. You speak for a tiny minority internationally of women who say they have chosen. When you do that you *erase the realities of those who do not choose* and especially *in the eyes of the men who create and perpetuate the demand in whose best interests it is to view all prostitutes as “sex workers” and to pat themselves on the back for supporting “harm reduction.”

Right here in this thread we’ve got Ren defending a pornmaker/star/prostituted woman, Nina Hartley, who is an icon, who publicly rejects the use of condoms in het porn because it’s “boring” and inefficient. (Hartley is also a nurse!) When I challenge what that models to basically the entire porn-watching population (who begin at a young age these days), Ren’s answer is that she wrote a blog post once about what bad sex ed porn is, like that’s some answer. I don’t care how many condoms get handed out in the Third World somewhere (as someone commented proudly in a post I haven’t approved yet), what about fracking highly privileged sex workers married to publishers of Hustler’s fetish porn modeling random, highly dangerous, het sex practices with many partners, without condoms? How is handing out condoms in Chile addressing the tremendous harm that particular modeling does, in terms not only of what is imitated by young people, but what is demanded (and taken) from prostituted women by johns? Hell, Nina Hartley does it without condoms, everybody in porn does it without condoms, why shouldn’t he be able to go without condoms?

Maybe the onus is not on prostituted women to prevent harm yet, but if the prostituting of women is framed as an “industry” where those in the “industry” are working towards getting their “needs and wants” met, then ultimately, the onus WILL be on prostituted women, because if all of these “sex workers” are doing all of this great stuff for themselves, what’s prostituted women’s problem? Shouldn’t they get off the dime and organize for harm reduction between getting raped and beaten by johns, pimps and who knows who all? These women’s struggle to just live through another day is being ERASED by a few very privileged people who on the one hand other them relentlessly and on the other hand presume to speak for them.


Right about there, dear readers, is where I fucking lost it. My comment, at this point still in mod, says this:

Heart:


God, hexy, you SO talk out of both sides of your mouth. On the one hand you make this huge distinction between SEX WORKERS and PROSTITUTES and insist the two categories not be confused. On the other hand you talk about harm reduction, decriminalization, etc., as though ALL prostituted women are in fact “sex workers,” referring to them as people in the “industry” who are organizing around “needs and wants”.



I'm afraid I don't see the contradiction. I do think the needs of sex workers and prostituted people are wildly different, and I think you just affirmed that by stating that the things I mentioned (all of which are clamoured for by sex workers around the world) do no good for prostituted people. I'm agreeing with you! Sex worker's rights are rubbish for people who don't want to be sex workers in the first place, and I've never said otherwise.


But I'm not going to say that women like me, sex workers, women in the sex industry who don't consider themselves to be prostituted people, should therefore NOT have human and industrial rights. We want to be able to do our work safely and legally. That's important. Prostituted women want out of the industry, they want support to be safe from those victimising them, and they want other options. That's important too. Since when does feminism require that we choose some women to have rights and options and others to not matter enough?


It’s exhibit A of what my contact is talking about. She didn’t care about harm reduction, she didn’t want to be called a sex worker, she wasn’t organizing around needs and wants, she just wanted to get OUT, as by far most prostituted women DO.


And she is equally as important as women who say we DO want to be called sex workers and given safe working conditions, no more and no less! Her "needs and wants", be they exit strategies or anything else, are important. Why is this so hard to grasp? If sex workers can pour so much of our incredibly limited resources and activism into helping women who don't want to be sex workers, why can we not even get a nod and the right to name ourselves from those who devote their entire activism to these ends?


You speak for a tiny minority internationally of women who say they have chosen.

No, I don't. I speak for myself. I happen to agree with a hell of a lot of women who stand behind sex worker's rights, across the world, in a huge variety of privilege and economic conditions.


I don’t care how many condoms get handed out in the Third World somewhere (as someone commented proudly in a post I haven’t approved yet), what about fracking highly privileged sex workers married to publishers of Hustler’s fetish porn modeling random, highly dangerous, het sex practices with many partners, without condoms?

Heart, I'm completely stunned that you just posted that. Are you honestly saying that you think Nina Hartley not using condoms in a commercial pornography context is more important than the fact that women are DYING because they can't get their hands on a life saving piece of latex? You honestly feel that the message sent to Western porn consumers by Nina Hartley's work is more deserving of attention than impoverished third world sex workers not being able to access the condoms they have demanded from international health support services?

How is handing out condoms in Chile addressing the tremendous harm that particular modeling does, in terms not only of what is imitated by young people, but what is demanded (and taken) from prostituted women by johns?

It's not. Women in third world countries aren't getting HIV because "johns" have seen condom free sex in porn, they're getting HIV because they don't have access to the condoms they want and need. It's not all one issue.

Maybe the onus is not on prostituted women to prevent harm yet, but if the prostituting of women is framed as an “industry” where those in the “industry” are working towards getting their “needs and wants”


Exit strategies ARE a want and need that has been addressed by sex worker's rights groups, amongst other groups. This has been pointed out repeatedly. You continue to ignore it.

These women’s struggle to just live through another day is being ERASED by a few very privileged people who on the one hand other them relentlessly and on the other hand presume to speak for them.


You know, I'm pretty sure that this comment already won't be published, as not only have my previous comments been moderated out, but I've well and truly lost my temper a few paragraphs ago. So to hell with being polite for this bit: Heart, you do NOT get to talk to me about privilege. There are a hell of a lot of women in worse circumstances than me, and I try to do the best with what limited privilege I have, but I am DONE with having heterosexual, able-mind-and-bodied, white American non-whores try to tell me that I'M the one with unchecked privilege in a conversation because I have the audacity to insist that disability, race, and past trauma doesn't completely negate my agency, and to have the crazy idea that ALL women involved in any way in commercial sex and prostitution have the right to decide for themselves (OURselves) what will make our individual and group situations better.

I've always thought you're an important feminist voice, Heart, even when I've personally disagreed with particular politics of yours. This isn't a political disagreement. This is you, personally, telling women in the sex industry to STFU and insisting that women with far fewer options than yourself are too privileged to be part of a discussion.


FOR FUCK'S SAKE. Even reading through that again to put the HTML tags in has filled me with blinding rage, starting from the assumption that Heart's email contacts with women involved in prostitution trump the rest of ours (and putting aside that unfortunate and infamous fact that sex workers tend to do most of their support and networking with, oh, other sex workers... I guess those sex worker only email lists we all keep mentioning just don't count) through to the bit where the impact American women's porn has on American women is clearly more significant than non-Western sex workers having access to life-saving condoms, and right up to the bit at the end...

Yeah. The bit at the end. Where Cheryl Lindsay Seelhoff calls me privileged.

The required reading starts here. It extends through the Disability Rights and Mad Pride movements, through the status of Indigenous Australians in Australia today and at least a basic reader on colonialism and disenfranchisement of colonised people (Hint: I do not think that word means what you think it means) and the history of the Stolen Generation (hint: MY FUCKING FAMILY). I'd suggest GLBTQ reading, but I've watched and read as that's been dismissed on that same blog over the last few years. My biggest suggestion? Heart, put down that fucking "choice" club you keep using to insist that actual sex workers who disagree with you are posting from penthouses with multiple degrees on the wall and, oh I don't know, big piles of money instead of beds. Hell, I wrote this post from the inside of a brothel on a day where I earned exactly zero dollars. For the third day in a row. When some of us say we own our choice to work in the sex industry and that we're in charge of our own lives, that doesn't mean everything's peachy wonderful. We are still women, working women, disabled women, queer women, women of colour and other non-white women, non-neurotypical women, women with and without kids and partners, women with drug habits, old women, young women, women with and without histories of rape and domestic violence, fat women, modified women... the list goes on. You do not get to stick us all in some bullshit category of luxury and privilege just because we dare to say we chose the best option we had.



I'm not surprised. I am a bit genuinely disillusioned: I've been criticised and mocked quite a bit for the idea that feminism not only has a place for all women but NEEDS us. I think we need radical feminism, liberal feminism, socialist feminism, ecofeminism, sex-positive feminism, anarchofeminism. We need academic feminists and working class feminists. We need feminists who have the economic privilege to speak with their buying power and feminists who speak from experience of hardship and poverty. We need WOMEN, all women, because if feminism is any fucking good at all it represents all of us, not just those who fit the right narrative.

What feminism doesn't fucking need is this bullshit. It doesn't need women and sex worker voices being silenced because some woman privileged enough to purport to run for president of the USA has decided that one class of women she isn't part of it should be heard more than another class of women she isn't part of.

I've defended Heart in the past, and I'll probably do it again in the future. As I said, I think she's important. But that line, there? This queer, Indigenous, non-neurotypical sex working feminist isn't going to be polite when that one's trodden on, and that conversation shot right over it with that wonderful obliviousness to its own fuck up that is the one privilege I envy.

Fuck that shit.

Monday, September 01, 2008

Repost: Mania and how it is for me.

When a person says to you “I’m depressed” or “I have depression”, most people have at least a vague understanding of what that means. You may not be able to accurately assess exactly what negative thoughts are occupying them, and you may not instantly recognise the intensity of their depression, but you will probably have at least some frame of reference for what depression is.



This is not the case with mania. When presented with a person who describes their mental state as “manic”, most people have only a vague idea of what is referred to. While part of this difference in awareness can be attributed to the fact that depression is a more common symptom than mania, or to the fact that education campaigns about depression and its symptoms are simply more frequent, I believe responsibility also lies with the fact that manic episodes are different for everyone who has them.



The “classic” impression of a manic episode is the one which lies directly opposite depression in every way: high and happy, giggling and giddy, full of soaring if irrational optimism and overwhelmingly positive thoughts. Sounds fun, right? Unfortunately, it’s not sustainable, and almost always leads to a crash… and it’s not until you crash that you finally realise that your flight of mania was completely devoid of rationality, common sense, and the instinct of self-preservation so integral to living a normal life.



In amonst the hundred of manic episodes I have had in my life, only a handful have been this type of episode. They are certainly addictive, and I can understand why people who have them regularly often succumb to the temptation to ditch their meds and fly once more. As a general rule, however, my manic episodes differ wildly to this model.



When I start climbing the mountain of mania, I often don’t notice that I’m acting or thinking in an unusual fashion. My energy levels are higher than usual, but I’m agitated and irritable rather than bubbly. It becomes much easier to piss me off, and I become very critical of both myself and others. My thoughts start to race, and my body tenses up. I often also find myself getting extremely horny and craving various kinky practices. Most significantly in terms of how my symptoms impact others, I begin to lose my capacity for empathy. Other people’s feelings, thoughts and perspectives begin to seem irrelevant. If they occur to me at all, they are swiftly dismissed as unimportant. All of this is accompanied by a slowly increasing sense of invulnerability, both physical and mental. My health and welfare slips from my mind, and I have a certainty I can’t pin down that my stance on any topic is entirely correct and entirely justified.



As I climb higher, other people’s feelings cease to exist entirely. I can no longer comprehend the idea of other people having feelings at all, much less caring about them. I stop being able to read body language and facial expressions, and it takes me longer to tell people apart. Eventually, when I hit the absolute heights of mania, it becomes difficult to even tell the difference between people and other objects. The world outside my head is simply a collection of stimuli, some of it flying past without me noticing, some of it enhanced and magnified. This enhanced stimuli, whether it is a sound, a colour, a taste… it is amazingly powerful and beautiful in a way I cannot describe. At this stage, I cannot carry on a conversation, but a glance at a sunset will have me on my knees crying its sheer beauty. I cannot pay attention to the lyrics of a song, but a certain phrase in a piece of music will speak to me on levels I didn’t know I had. Throughout all of this, however, bubbles an undercurrent of rage, of jealousy, of high energy negative emotion. I feel powerful, superior, like I am the center of the universe and controller of all things, and anything that dissatisfies me brings down a fury appropriate to the wrath of a god. I will rage and scream and smash things, threaten violence and ramifications, and the focus of this anger can be myself or the world in general.



Usually by this stage I haven’t slept or eaten for three or four days, and am well on my way to crazy sandwich board lady status. It’s a terrifying place to be, but again, strangely addictive. That anger, however destructive, is such a pure feeling. It’s like human emotion with the filters stripped away, undiluted and untranslated.



I know it’s awful, I know it’s terrifying, but I also know I don’t want to come down.

Repost: LEarning to live in a quiet room

Most people have experienced the difficulty of trying to do something in a loud environment that is usually done in peace and quiet. Reading or studying, for example, can be almost impossible in a place full of noise and distractions.



For the moment, I want to try and invert that experience.



Imagine a room where every wall is lined with televisions, each one playing something different. Some show documentaries, cold and clinical, where others display the most amusing comedy or the most touching drama. Some simply display static, loud and disorientating white noise. Some show familiar scenes, others footage you’ve never seen featuring people you’ve never known. All have their volume turned up and, most confusingly, almost all of them randomly change channels with no discernable pattern to the changes and no warning that the channel is about to flick to something different.



The windows to this room are open all the time, and a constant stream of traffic noise comes through each one . People can be heard walking past and talking, and you constantly catch bits and pieces of their conversations. Occasionally you’ll hear an indication of some kind of change in the weather; rain, maybe, or thunder. The windows cannot be closed.



Wherever you stand in the room, four men stand around you, yelling constantly. Theirs is the only noise that varies based on feedback from you: Any subject that enters your brain prompts them to yell out anything they can think of that even vaguely relates to that subject, be it anecdotes, quote from various reference material that they never bother to quote the source of, or even random words. They also throw bits of paper at you as constantly as they yell, which are covered in pictures and sketches that illustrate your subject visually, although there is no guarantee that these depictions will be done well.



Most people would have great difficulty concentrating on anything in this room. If you sat them in the middle of it and handed them a book, they’d likely go mad before they could manage to read a single page.



This is the room I grew up in. This is the way my brain worked from childhood until the year I turned nineteen. Not only did I learn to read in this room, I learned to think, to write, to interact with other people. I learned to focus a lot of my energy on shutting out various forms of noise and avoiding distraction, and I did this for a long enough time that it became an automatic process costing very little effort at all. Everything I thought was fueled and assisted by those four metaphorical yelling men, who of course represent my brain itself throwing everything I had read or thought or heard at me if it could vaguely be connected with my current train of thought. I knew no other way to think.



And then, two weeks after my nineteenth birthday and two days after I was first admitted to Northside Psychiatric Hospital, I was put on an antipsychotic. I fell asleep, as people are wont to do when given potent psychiatric medication, and slept through until the next morning.



When I woke, I sat bolt upright, eyes wide and heart thumping. I had one thought racing through my head, a rare enough occurrence in and of itself but all the more dramatic with that thought being what it was.



“Why is it so quiet in here?”



It took me a little while to realise that the “in here” in question was the inside of my head, and longer still to accept the ramifications of this. I knew I had symptoms that needed to be controlled by psychiatric medication; I had not realised that the very manner in which I had been thinking my entire life was one of them. Over the next few weeks as I continued to take the medication, my “room” got steadily more and more quiet, until I found myself more or less alone in my head. The “voices” representative of my psychosis had thankfully departed, but with them had gone my yelling men, my televisions, even those open windows. There was a quiet murmur of background noise, but little else. To anyone else, it would have been the most perfect environment in which to think, to read or to study. For me, it was hell. When your entire life has been lived with a certain noise in the background, nothing disconcerts you more than the removal of that noise.



I have been on that medication for five years now, and I can finally say that I think I have a future. I am working, I am able to maintain relatively normal human relationships and interactions, and my brain doesn’t constantly try and convince me to kill the body that keeps it alive. I live a more or less normal life, with a few mental quirks and a dose of medication every night to remind me that I’m not quite like everyone else. I would overwhelmingly agree that things are better.



But some things are harder to do. I cannot create like I used to, as I have lost the four men who scream ideas at me even when I’m sleeping. I have no constant muse, no well of concepts and constructs to tap at will. When I cannot think of a word, I must look it up, rather than just monitoring the inevitable stream of synonyms pouring through my head until the one that feels right appears. My thoughts move slowly, more deliberately than they ever have, although still are prone to tangents.



I have been repeatedly assured by brilliant mental health professionals and medical staff that this is how the brains of most people work. As far as they have managed to comprehend how my mind functioned before, they say that it was not healthy and not sustainable; that the breakdown was prompted by trauma but would have occurred inevitably at some point. I barely slept for over ten years, they point out, and that is not something that can happen without consequences. They apply a label to what was simply thought of as “weird kid”, and that label is “childhood pre-schizophrenia”. I am grateful for my health and my life, but if the option was available to have that brain without the resulting sickness, I would snap it up in a second. I do not understand how people manage to achieve so much with brains that work this slowly.



Five years. In five years I have healed and grown and adapted, and I have slowly made ground in what I call mental physiotherapy. From the ground up, I have learned how to think with this new brain, and while I am certainly not the person I was before, I can find bits of her hidden in here. I have gained so much ground, but there are things I have not done in all that time and they are things I miss.



I have not painted, sketched, drawn or sculpted anything. I have not played a single note of music, and I have not listened to music intuitively, knowing what sound translates to what note on a page, knowing how it is put together. I have not written a word that was fiction, or that was intended for some purpose other than communication, or that was written in any voice other than mine. Five years is a long time to live in a world without music and art when ones’ previous habitat was so rich in such things.



Writing this makes my eyes prickle with tears. Yes, I still cry for what I have lost, and I don’t know if I will ever regain my art and my music. But my writing? It has occasionally peeped around corners, waved at me from the darkness, and whispered in my ear when I do not expect it to. I have the chance to learn to write again in this quiet room. The words come slowly and painfully where once they flew thick and fast and frantic, but every journey begins with slow and awkward steps.



I believe I may have just taken that first one.